I understand. At this point, I'm talking about an hour. I would agree that the witness should be added to the other proposed witnesses and appear during the second hour of the second meeting. Given that we're already planning to hear witnesses for a meeting and a half, and given that we have two-hour meetings, Mr. Chapdelaine's testimony would complement the second meeting. I think that would be a good compromise.
On May 4th, 2021. See this statement in context.