Thank you, Chair, for the question.
When we talk about codevelopment, there are some things we want to think about. Some are things we already talked about through the engagement sessions but at a very high level. We really need to get into some further detail around defining criteria and what that actually means. We can't pretend to define that criteria as a government. That must be done with partners and with technical organizations on the ground who have a clear understanding about what that impact will be.
You have heard a little about oversight and about the importance of who actually oversees the red dress alert. That's another important element that we would want to talk about further with partners and come to ground on what that oversight would look like and how law enforcement would be involved in the red dress alert system.
We also need to talk about what information is captured. How is that information captured and who oversees that information? How is that shared publicly, and what elements of that are shared publicly? Those are all things we need to continue to have conversations about and to engage on with indigenous partners and with people who have a solid understanding of that on the ground.
Maybe I will add one last thing. I'm sure the committee has heard about wraparound services and about the need for the connections between and among the wraparound services, which need to exist to support families and survivors once a woman is found. How do we make sure that takes place? What exists already? How do we make those connections between the various services that are offered and that exist? What gaps exist?