I'll begin by answering the second question.
In my opinion, it's very important to clarify that, at the moment, the law allows family courts to use the discredited notion of parental alienation. Even if we train these people well, it will never be enough. The law needs to be changed.
We heard from other witnesses earlier that survivors minimize the abuse they've experienced. This is absolutely true. However, the courts apply a theory that states that women exaggerate the abuse they've experienced. Of course, no one can be against training, but this didn't create the results we were hoping for.
We really hope the committee will recommend a change in family law because even if judges understand what coercive control is, the theory remains that what the mother says is not true. In any case, even if it's true, the child still needs to be forced to live with the father whether he has been convicted or not.