I can answer that quickly.
Regarding the definition, what matters most to us is that it be included in the Divorce Act, whose comprehensive definition of family violence doesn't include deprivation of liberty and micro-regulation of daily life, which are the hallmarks of coercive control. To us, that's crucial, and it has to be added to the Act next time it's amended.
Regarding training and knowledge, improving the definition in the Act would provide guidance not only for judges, but also for the professionals who work with this Act. It would add to the available information that can be used to provide guidance to the courts, as well as to lawyers and litigants.
As my colleague said, mandatory training will definitely have to be added so that this information doesn't simply exist in the Act, but is also understood and applied.