Yes, I agree with that completely. What it's also doing is reinforcing their credibility within the jurisprudence and the case law that lawyers can bring forth—that in this case, this case and this case this individual was utilized to provide therapy. Then they get reordered yet again. However, I think I said earlier that there is no follow-up case law as to whether that reunification therapy was successful or what the actual outcomes and potentially traumatic impacts were to the children, such as Witness 2.
On October 7th, 2024. See this statement in context.