I agree with you. You hit the nail on the head. What I think is one of the underlying causes, which I think they're hiding behind, is, as you said, the $75 cost. They want to hide behind science but I think it's numbers.
I'm wondering if anyone on this committee knows—and I would point to Dr. Seely, being that she's a doctor—whether cost is an issue. Is it thrown at you that we can't do these screenings because it's going to cost the system too much money? Is that ever brought up?