Evidence of meeting #127 for Status of Women in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was femicide.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Alison Irons  As an Individual
Megan Walker  Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual
Cait Alexander  Founder, End Violence Everywhere
Shelina Jeshani  Director, Strategic Partnerships and Collaboration, Safe Centre of Peel
Anuradha Dugal  Executive Director, Women's Shelters Canada

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

If we continue to talk about the violence against women when every single day there's another victim, this is never going to change unless we can persuade the current government to change the bail reform act and keep these criminals in jail so that women can walk safely on the street. Would you agree with that?

12:20 p.m.

Founder, End Violence Everywhere

12:20 p.m.

Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual

Megan Walker

I would ask the government this question: How many dead women does it take for you to recognize that there's a crisis with women in this community?

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

Exactly.

I also want to make note that your parents are here, Ms. Alexander. I have to tell you that I'm very proud of you, of your strength and of your parents' strength, because—

12:20 p.m.

Founder, End Violence Everywhere

Cait Alexander

They're lucky. They're lucky I'm here.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

We're very proud. You stand for all women. Your strength has given me strength to carry on this fight, and I will continue that fight for both of you and for all women, because we need to change the law.

I can't say it enough. We have to stop talking about it, stop researching it, and change the law to make individuals understand that in Canada we appreciate and respect women. Right now, that's not the case.

12:20 p.m.

Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual

Megan Walker

I just want to add one more quick point about that.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

If you could incorporate that into the next person's questions, into that time, that would be great.

12:20 p.m.

Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Thank you, MP Roberts.

MP Hepfner, you have the floor for five minutes.

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Thank you, genuinely, to all of our witnesses for their testimony today. It's really important.

We've been talking about bail reform and Bill C-75, so I just want to go over what's in that legislation and get your feedback on what you would change.

In 2019 we created a reverse onus, so if you've been charged with a violent offence involving an intimate partner, it's on you. The onus has reversed. The accused has to prove why they should be let out on bail. That changed.

12:20 p.m.

Founder, End Violence Everywhere

Cait Alexander

It doesn't happen.

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

The courts have to consider previous intimate partner violence convictions. Strangulation has to be considered. Serious forms of sexual assault have to be considered. It involves a higher maximum penalty in cases involving—

12:20 p.m.

Founder, End Violence Everywhere

Cait Alexander

It's not implemented.

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

It's not the law that's wrong; it's the way that it's being implemented by courts.

12:20 p.m.

Founder, End Violence Everywhere

Cait Alexander

Why should we have to prove it, when it's on video? That's a huge problem in this country, because charter rights are good for good people, but they are not good for criminals.

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

We have heard today that the problem is the law, so I've read out the law, but what you're telling me is that it's not the law but the implementation at the court level—

12:25 p.m.

Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual

Megan Walker

I'm not going to go back and forth on that point. The point is that it's not being implemented, and women are being killed, so I don't want to argue about this or that.

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

I think it's important to nail down where, exactly, it needs to be changed.

12:25 p.m.

Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual

Megan Walker

It is the law, because if the law were working and appropriately drafted, I would not be sitting in a courtroom, on an ongoing basis, watching justices of the peace say, “Now, are you sure you won't do it again?” and let him go. It's rare—

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

It's how the justices of the peace are interpreting the law. Okay.

Let me move on to my next question about—

October 28th, 2024 / 12:25 p.m.

Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual

Megan Walker

No. Don't say that, please. I don't accept that. I think it was a poorly written law, and it needs to be changed.

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

In what way, exactly, would you change it?

12:25 p.m.

Founder, End Violence Everywhere

Cait Alexander

My ex is free. He was out the next day after he tried to kill me, full stop.

12:25 p.m.

Advocate to End Male Violence Against Women, As an Individual

Megan Walker

I think it needs to be changed, after consultation with survivors, so their experiences are reflected in it, and that is missing. I think, if that were included, we would have a stronger piece of legislation that would potentially save lives.