Certainly.
The task force follows internationally accepted standards for our methods. When we're looking at experts in their roles, the recommendations are to have them as non-voting members. The reason for that is that what they see and how they see it is very different. They see people with disease, as opposed to family physicians and primary care. We see the entire population.
Specialists or experts tend to recommend interventions at a much higher rate and more frequently than independent panels. The evidence definitely supports that.
As a result, our experts are non-voting members, as per standard guidelines—