Yes, I would like to add a little.
The integrated terrorism assessment centre is a functional component of CSIS. We don't exist in legislation. We have the CSIS Act to guide us, and it represents the scope. However, we are an integrated centre, so you would be surprised to find out that we have, for example, a complement from the RCMP, and that we work actively through the CSIS regional offices in particular to engage police of jurisdiction across the country.
The assessment function that we undertake in the current threat environment causes us to be as elastic as possible in understanding what is occurring in—to use a term but not to employ jargon—what I prefer to call a “verge activity”. These are activities that are very close to meeting the threshold of the definition of violent extremism and terrorism that my colleague identified but that understand that there is a bit of a permeable membrane where certain activities can be hate one minute and national security the next minute.
To answer the question, then, I will say that we operate from a functional perspective based on the definition. However, practically speaking, we are engaged with law enforcement to try to cover the spectrum, particularly because the threat of a lone actor in Canada requires it of us.