Actually, I didn't have much more to say. I would add, however, that I find the concept of dangerous speech very interesting. It's not just a question of hate speech, but rather it's about really looking at the consequences of that kind of speech and rhetoric.
My colleague Mr. Boyce talked about social media as an environment where anything goes, but this type of discourse sometimes also spreads through public communications, such as columns, books or perhaps larger media outlets, that paint an alarmist and biased picture of gender-affirming care or the place of LGBTQ+ people.
In our training sessions, someone might tell me that they read such and such a thing in the newspaper, even though the reporting was not based on proven facts. It's harder to disprove something that comes from a column or report that appears in so-called traditional media than when it comes from a Facebook post.