I think that's really interesting, because the stats and the data around this are so challenging. We know there's an intersectionality here that comes with human trafficking, whether it's drugs, fraud, etc.
For the stats and the lucrative notion of what human trafficking is, if nobody had the chance to read The Globe and Mail article that featured Timea's story, I'll give you an idea of it. If the john has 40 females, then the daily profit is $36,000. The weekly profit is $252,000, and the annual profit is $13,104,000. You can quickly see how lucrative this industry is and why it is so hard to stop it.
My question to you would be, if it's presenting as something else, could we create something in that national database—which is part of your recommendation, which I think is critical—that says they were taken in on charges of fraud or drug trafficking but there was indication as well of human trafficking?
It's so hard for the victims to admit that, right? There's a lot of reluctance there.