Thank you, Madam Chair.
Frankly, it's very difficult to decide. I understand, and I agree that each of the proposals and motions tabled and waiting to be dealt with is very important. With all due respect, I do not think we should tackle these proposals and motions in the order in which they are presented to us. I believe that, in this case, logic dictates that one motion that has been tabled before another motion does not necessarily take precedence. We must consider other aspects, and the aspect here is urgency, Madam Chair.
I'll speak for myself. As a woman, I am constantly in a state of hypervigilance, and it is unbearable. I go out at night, and I use public infrastructure. I am uneasy and perpetually on guard, on the alert. It's totally abnormal.
Ms. Ferreri clearly illustrated this situation through the newspaper articles she tabled. The issue is current, and current events are calling on us to address it. We've really put our finger on something. We need to do something about the daily lives of women and girls who go to school or work, and of some women who accompany their children on public transport—the subway, the bus, and so on. It's a matter of urgency and a priority situation because it is ongoing. We're talking about violence against women. We can see it and verify it, and we are all in a state of hypervigilance.
I support Ms. Ferreri's proposal.