Thank you. I very much appreciate those voices that you are bringing here today.
My next question is for Ms. Coyle.
I'm going back to some of the things you said. It sounds that a lot of the arguments to amend this bill are around the fact that there are things that are redundant, things that may not be necessary, things that...well, the money would be better spent elsewhere.
What I'm not hearing is whether this bill would actually cause harm. When you're looking at something and saying it's already in the criminal law, that's very different from saying that if this bill is passed, there will actually be unintended consequences that would not have been in the legislative intent.
I also consider that when we heard witnesses previously, they talked not just about the sense of security or safety but also about the deterrent effect, for instance, that a bracelet would have, and also being able to prove in court where that person was if they did break their conditions.
I see Ms. Niman nodding. I'll give it to Ms. Coyle, and then if there's time, I'll have the other witnesses also respond.