In many situations the person is not necessarily an intimate partner. That intimate partner line can be really restricting. I'm really glad you asked that question. In terms of what else needs to be asked about, it is where the threat is coming from, who this person is, what safety concerns are being raised and what safety resources are being offered.
I feel, as I said in my submission, that the language being proposed right now is very minimalist. Although I do really celebrate that there is a proposal to create space for the voice of the survivors, it seems that it is very limiting. There needs to be more inquiry into what is going to happen when someone discloses the threat. You can't just ask what threat someone is facing and then not offer safety to the person. That's the big missing link.