I thank Chelsea for her clarification. I think it's imperative from a statutory construction perspective that we deal with clause 2, because if you look at provision in subsection (8), you see that it actually changes the entire meaning. It changes it from looking at the recognizance section to looking at the firearms section, so there are two different things that are spoken about. If that section actually changes, then it's going to have an impact on amendment G-14 also. That's why I think it's imperative that we deal with clause 2 before we can make this amendment. It's connected.
On December 4th, 2023. See this statement in context.