I think they're two separate issues. Clause 1 dealt with the bail provisions of the code, and clause 2 really gets into the peace bond regime, which is an entirely different regime.
Part of the confusion might be that some of the wording in section 810 was suggested to be amended by G-3, which would allow a police officer to bring the information on the intimate partner's behalf. Perhaps there's some confusion with how the rewording happened with the term “intimate partner” in that provision.
No, clause 2 is distinct from clause 1. They wouldn't have an impact on each other since they're two different regimes.