The existing peace bonds in the code, which have a duration of 12 months with the possibility of extension if there's a prior conviction, have been upheld as constitutional. Therefore, it does provide some comfort in terms of how the peace bond regime is compatible with the charter.
It's difficult to speculate on what courts would find if there were, for example, an indeterminate peace bond. How the courts would handle that under the charter is difficult to say, but all I can say right now is that the existing regime has been found to be consistent with the charter, and this motion would ensure that what's being proposed here is consistent with that existing regime as well.