This question, through you, Madam Chair, is actually for Ms. Sidhu. It is a question on behalf of the victims. It's a question on behalf of the family who has testified before us, who asked that this bill not be amended. That's what I'm trying to say. That's why I'm saying this is relevant. I'm trying to understand, because I've seen the work that we've done in FEWO. I've seen what we've done with Keira's law. Why are you gutting this bill and taking out victims' rights, victim consultation and wording around “intimate partner”, when we have testimony from the victims, who are asking for it not to be amended?
That is my question, through you, Madam Chair. Why are there these very rigorous amendments that change the whole heart of the bill?