There's some excellent insight here, because that's exactly where Emmanuella was working from, the fact that this is the legal.... This is the way they have interpreted it. This way is taking the entire context of the bill, and those are the words they have put in there.
I absolutely recognize what you're saying, that the words that legal has used and the words that perhaps Dominique, Andréanne and Emmanuella would feel more.... I don't know if that's the case. I don't know if it's more comfortable or not. I hear you.
We can't vote on the substance of the bill until we get through the subamendment. The subamendment has to be voted on first.
They are indicating that we can vote on it because.... Honestly, from what I'm hearing, we can vote on it because it does not have the support anyway. It does not matter how it's written. That's what I'm hearing from the discussion.