I don't believe that G-9 is consequential to G-3. The reason for G-9 is that this additional wording, “if the Attorney General has consented to this condition”, was actually added in the Senate, I believe, so the original bill didn't have that wording. When they added this wording in the Senate to this particular provision, they forgot to add it to the form as well. This is simply correcting this oversight from an amendment that was done in the Senate earlier.
On January 30th, 2024. See this statement in context.