This isn't mutually exclusive. No one has mentioned water treatment. A large amount of the infrastructure program was environmentally based. There were some cost-sharing agreements with provinces on highways and so on, but a big, big piece of it had to do with water treatment, sewage treatment, building in communities, supporting communities in their local infrastructure needs. If you look at the list of projects that were undertaken in that area, it was more often environmentally based.
I'm not saying that it necessarily means it should be that way. I'm not saying that at all. All I'm saying is that we need to recognize that here so we don't think of infrastructure as simply transportation or transport, which would be the way the committee would emerge, because that's what the committee has been. Windmills are eligible under the infrastructure program. I don't think they're going to get picked up easily in transportation. As long as we're deliberate in wanting to include them, I'm quite satisfied we will.
We'll have to be deliberate because it's not going to come naturally. I think the nature of the discussion so far has demonstrated that we're thinking of this as being transportation, and there's a lot more to infrastructure than that.