Mr. Julian, I think it's a very good question, and it comes up repeatedly. If you're to make a safety management system work, if you're to be able to find out what's going on in a particular operation, you need, as Marc has said and you've repeated, to have a free flow of information.
Frankly, one of the reasons why we need to provide some protection is that the first pass of this information has a lot to do with the associations that represent pilots and flight attendants, and they would very much like some protection from retribution. If there's any hint there's going to be retribution as a result of some report, then, fundamentally, the report will dry up. You won't get that information. Neither the government nor the company, nor for that matter the associations, will get that information. So we are asking for protections to be put in place for that purpose, to actually promote that free flow of information.
Now to the question of the public's right to know. I believe they do have the right to know and they will have access to that information, but only after it's met the privacy concerns. In other words, if I were to make a report and for some reason I'm culpable for something, and the company is going to take care of business, and the government knows how the company is going to take care of business, then the information that's about me should stay to the side, so that I will be encouraged to provide that information on an ongoing basis, and so will my confrères and my co-workers.
Once all that process is done, with the name removed, if you wish, all this information is available, and we'll be there to demand it on site with the people involved. But as far as the public goes, those things are reportable after the fact.