It complemented. I'm sure it did complement, but as Mr. Grégoire rightfully pointed out, we have to exist in a data-driven environment, and in fact there was no evidence to suggest that more flight attendants would have made the process any quicker or any better.
As to your seventh question—why not emulate best practices such as Australia's—Australia has looked at this, and they've decided not to go the other way. I would suggest to committee members that it would be an error in judgment to conclude that Australia is not going to the 1:50 ratio model because they have looked at this thing inside and out and have concluded it is unsafe. They are dealing with the same political pushback we are dealing with here. Unfortunately, they do not have the courage of their convictions to proceed. It's up to them to decide in their own best interests, but I would suggest to you, respectfully, that it was not because of a lack of merit of the position.
Unfortunately, I believe you had another question, but I didn't have time to write it down.