Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you for coming before us today.
I've got a series of questions. I'll get them all out and then ask for responses.
First, what's the estimate on the actual cost saving of having one less flight attendant? I'm thinking particularly of the B737-700s. How much would the airline save by having one less flight attendant?
Secondly, why are you not calling for stronger regulations? It is a major competitive advantage in an industry where, as you know, safety is a primary concern. Why not call for the strongest possible safety regulations and have a worldwide reputation that Canadian airlines are under more rigorous safety regulations than any other airline in other countries?
Third, on the issue of the internal process, it's my understanding that you mentioned organized labour. I assume you were referring to flight attendants. They've been part of the process, and they've been vehemently opposed. Within the internal process that you have, why aren't those views reflected in what you're bringing forward today?
Fourth, you mentioned an independent consultant who had done a study. Would you release that to the committee?
Fifth, on wide-body jets, you mentioned that you're looking at regulations to ensure every exit is covered by a flight attendant. But as you know from previous testimony, again for the B737-700s, there's an exit that's not covered. The fact is, with these new flight regulations, we're looking at dozens of aircraft with an uncovered exit. Is that not of concern to you? It certainly is to me.
The next question is on the United States. If I didn't misinterpret what you said, you mentioned that not one single report has indicated flight ratios were a factor. But I cited TWA Flight 843 and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, which clearly indicated that flight attendants and the fact that TWA went beyond FAA requirements were factors in ensuring that all of the 292 passengers were evacuated.
You also mentioned that it was universally accepted, but we know that Australia has reviewed flight attendant ratios and has rejected any diminishment of the safety standards they have. Why can't we emulate best practices in the industry?
My final comment is on an issue that Mr. Grégoire raised as well. We've been working on this for a number of years, but the public obviously has serious concerns. Flight attendants who are the first-line responders have serious concerns. Why don't you drop it?