Okay.
The second question I want to put to you is around the air travel complaints commissioner in the office. I put the same question in three or four different ways yesterday to the acting president of the CTA. I was trying to get a sense of whether there was a difference in having an independent commissioner with an independent office. We know that before, it was a temporary measure to oversee the particular trials and tribulations of AC's acquisition of Canadian Airlines, but now this notion of burying the air travel complaints commissioner's office to a certain extent and operationalizing it, mainstreaming it in the CTA, concerns me.
When Mr. Hood left his position and since then a number of CTA officials have been on record as saying that one of the wonderful roles the commissioner's office played was to track trends, as opposed to isolated events--to track trends. So if there are 16, 18, or 22 instances of, say, food poisoning--you know this better than I do, as the industry representative--do you think that by placing the commissioner's office and the process inside the CTA we're going to lose some of the arm's-length aspect, the third party type of relationship that a commissioner can have? Don't you think the airline industry would say it's great, let's have third party scrutiny and let's have a race to the top?