Given the date of the notice of motion and given the date of the minister's comments, is it fair to assume that the notice was given before the minister made his comments?
Consequently, what this is about is that the notice, to some extent, became redundant. I don't mind the intervention, Ms. Chow, and I know how important this is. However, I think for the committee, now that the first piece of this motion has been satisfied, and since we know the report is going to be made public, we have to have the maturity and the responsibility to look at the report and make a determination as to whether this is what we would wish to do.
Bringing to the attention of everybody how important everything else is that we're doing is not meant to belittle the importance of this. I think we will make a better judgment once we've seen the report and can decide whether it's worthy of pushing something else aside.