We had two specific objectives: responding to the legal framework, in other words to the bill as such, in terms of unreasonable noise level; and emphasizing the importance of protecting public health and the quality of citizens' lives. That is our basic position.
Then, beyond the scope of the bill, we are advocating a longer-term comprehensive approach based on a national policy to reduce railway noise that would establish a direction, objectives, and strategies for intervention. So perhaps this national policy could include a comprehensive approach, once the regulations are very specific and a decision has been made with respect to noise and quality of life.