I do not disagree with the idea put forth by Mr. Julian and Ms. Chow. Here is my only problem: the minister said that he would make it public. It is just that. I agree with studying it. Once it is made public, let's study it. I would move an amendment that would say once it is been made public by the minister, we study it. I do not have a problem with that.
If that is not the case and Mr. Julian's intention is to force the minister to table it more quickly and he tables it by next week, why adopt this motion right away? I am asking myself an existential question.
I recommend that Mr. Julian leave it on the agenda and that we deal with it next time, once the report has been made public. Then we will automatically invite at least Mr. Tassé, so that he can disclose the content of his report.
But I really do not know, I too am wondering about the urgency. In fact, the minister did say, unless I missed something, that he would make it public. That is what you were saying, Mr. Jean. Is it more complicated than that?
Go ahead.