If that public investment is in the name of.... Generally I think your business is seeing attention and investment by virtue of environmental issues, fast transit, and so on. The strategic infrastructure fund speaks very specifically to an interest in this, and that you would represent the interest. It occurs to me that whatever moneys would flow from that investment would more appropriately be rolled back into more investment along the same lines.
Now, granted the revenue flow, if this is done as you're suggesting, it would be less because the prospect of arbitration would cause the negotiations to be more favourable. I think that's the basis of your optimism. I just want to make sure I haven't....