Thank you.
Welcome, gentlemen.
I will follow more or less along Mr. Fast's questions. I was on the GVRD board and TransLink when this issue came up, and I can remember the angst and the anger that we felt at knowing what we understood were the comparative rates between different areas in Canada that the same rail line was charging for passenger rail or comparable service. We felt we were paying an inordinately high amount for this in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia.
As I understand the bill, I gather from your comments that you focused on the issue of assets and the valuation. In terms of the process for adjudication of a dispute, do you believe this would actually address...? What it provides for now is, first of all, publicity of future contracts and application to current contracts if the parties agree that the information can be released.
Do you believe there will be any blockage? I don't presume West Coast Express is going to object to the information being released. From your knowledge, do you believe the railway will oppose it being released?