Can I clarify the motion, in response to Mr. Jean?
As a friendly amendment, we can certainly add the words “in Canada” on the third line, after “into rail safety”. That was implied. I wasn't talking about just British Columbia. I said, “and particularly the recent rail accidents in British Columbia and western Canada”. The inference was that it's to conduct an in-depth inquiry into rail safety in Canada, and I meant that in the broader sense.
I'm happy to add “in Canada” as a friendly amendment, if that responds to your concern, Mr. Jean.