I'm taking the liberty of going back to clause 39 because it adds an element in the case of reassignments of railway lines. When a railway decides to reassign railway lines, you become a player on the chessboard.
I spoke with Transport Canada representatives. Have there been times when you would have liked railway lines to be abandoned and to have discussions on the subject because the railway companies were not using them, but had nevertheless decided to keep them? I know Transport Canada told us that this bill did not touch on that aspect, but have there been situations in which you would have liked to intervene, cases in which, in certain respects, the companies didn't show any interest in railway transportation, but perhaps only wanted to increase the value of an abandoned line?