At one point, the three of us decided — we're called the three amigos — that was enough. We met and we defended ourselves, particularly since the review of the act was under way. We took that opportunity to have a debate. We made similar submissions to the committee reviewing the act, and we were heard; that, moreover, is reflected here. That's why we're continuing our efforts in that direction. We think this is an opportunity to establish a base where there will be an arbitrator and minimum ground rules. In that way, we'll be able to make good progress with the railways in the next few years. It's currently an open playing field. So each party is trying to beat the other, in a way, which ultimately isn't conducive to very healthy negotiations or dealings.
On October 24th, 2006. See this statement in context.