And even beside that, the reality is that as a matter of good public policy, the price that should be paid for access should be a reasonable price. It shouldn't be replacement value. It shouldn't be full market value. It should be a reasonable price, and the agency can determine that. We would be okay with their decision under all scenarios.
But it shouldn't be done on an artificial historical book value, because in some instances...I'll give you an example. When CN was privatized, all of our eastern assets were written down by $1.5 billion. Everything we owned in the east, in Toronto, in Montreal, was written down by $1.5 billion. The value of the land is zero because that was in 1912, as I gave you in an example, and the value of the asset has been written down as part of the privatization. So book value is not the right metric.