On the issue of safety, 2005 was a year when the number of incidents was higher, so 2005 was not a good year from a safety standpoint. The number of incidents, though, is not telling the whole story. In the case of CN, 2005 was a mixture of two very significant, unfortunate, and dramatic accidents, one in Wabamun, one in the Cheakamus River, which you mentioned, and also a number of small incidents, which count in the count of incidents but sometimes involve one wheel or one small matter.
When you look at the long-term trend of the safety performance of both CN and CP, it has been one of consistent improvement over the last several years. This year alone, on the TSB measure, we are down more than 20% year over year, which proves that 2005 was a bit of an oddity.
Now, 2005 was a very unfortunate year in terms of very significant accidents that cost CN hundreds of millions of dollars. The Wabamun accident alone cost CN and its insurers more than $100 million. You can rest assured that CN does not have any business interest in seeing any more of those accidents. Unfortunately, sometimes rails break, and if they break right beside a lake, sometimes it does cause environmental damage. On balance, though, rail is the safest mode. That's why some of those dangerous products are there in the first place.