I would oppose the addition of the word “Canada”, not because it is not important, but because we will run out of time.
We must look at what is going on. Mr. Bell's first motion had to do with problems in British Columbia and western Canada. I agree with that. If we are going to resolve what is going on in the west, we might as well add the problems with BC Rail and resolve this entire section.
I have concerns about safety at Montreal Airport and I am still waiting for some of their people to appear before the committee. Let us not draw it out by trying to resolve all the problems, or we will end up not solving anything. I am not against adding extra days for debate. I would be happy to take part.
It is fine with me that we are tackling the problem raised by Mr. Bell concerning western Canada. Which is why I oppose adding the word “Canada”. It is not that I do not agree. It is simply that, if we attempt to analyze all of Canada, we will have to drop what we are currently working on. I think Mr. Bell raised an important problem, so, let's resolve it. I agree with extending it to include British Columbia, in response to the requests made today.