Mr. Easter, if it isn't statutory grain, the provisions in the legislation seem to work very well for most commodities.
There is an appeal mechanism through the agency if there is some disagreement relative to compensation on the cars. The complexity comes around the fact that there's a revenue cap, an averaging process, and all kinds of complexities such that it is very difficult for shippers moving commodity grain to acquire a car supply, as others do, to ensure they can meet market needs.
The interpretation from our legal counsel is that it's unclear. As a result, there's a tendency for shippers to not move in that area because it becomes very costly to go through a process of level-of-service complaints with the agency.
We think clarification would clearly benefit shippers, especially secondary processors that have contacted us for car supply. It would then be clear that they could get the cars and adequate compensation and at the same time the railway would be treated fairly. I think it's a combination to ensure that if the railway pays for compensation, they are not penalized under the revenue cap.