Just as a comment, again, the drafter would have to review this, but legally speaking, I'm not sure you can direct a regulation. For the sake of discussing this motion, would just removing “only if they are necessary”...? We don't make a lot of changes in the French version. We still use the same terminology, sont utilisées.
For the sake of the discussion, would it be acceptable to Mr. McGuinty for us to basically say, “regulation and strategic public intervention occur to achieve economic, environmental or social outcomes”, to maintain consistency with the French that is proposed in the motion?
Would that achieve what you're after?