The only question I have--and this may be purely academic--is what if there was an amendment defeated in a clause that would have a bearing on one to which there were no amendments? If it were defeated but would have a bearing later, could we reserve the right, if we passed all of the uncontested clauses, to have an opportunity later to say that one doesn't pass because it bears on something. As long as you would recognize that possibility.... In other words, there are clauses here that may not have amendments, but a failure of an amendment someplace else may have a bearing later on them.
