All I was going to say, and I didn't mention it, is that I think “adequate” does, as you said, weaken the purpose of the legislation, and for that reason I don't like it. But I think the amendment that Mr. McGuinty specifically put forward on environment is clear, and I think that's good. I couldn't support the motion on the basis of “adequate” myself, but if that word were removed, I would certainly be prepared to.
On November 21st, 2006. See this statement in context.