I'll try.
Currently this bill envisages two reports. One is called an industry report that the department provides, and Mr. Scott's suggestion is that it be very tiny. Right now, according to the legislation, we can't get away with that. We have to make a big report. There's a second report, which is the one we were explaining to Monsieur Carrier. The agency has to report annually on its business, how it conducts its business, the cases it hears, the complaints it hears. And that's not changing. There are no changes proposed to that.
On this report, the industry review, the government is proposing that it be changed from one year to three years. The motions put forward suggest that we keep it at one year, but on top of that, that we produce a new five-year report that would be even more comprehensive than what we have to produce now on an annual basis. I guess our concern is we already produce a very comprehensive report. It is very time consuming. We believe that if we did it every three years, instead of every year, we could make it more comprehensive. We could do what you're asking us to do in the five-year report in the three years, and then every year just put the data on the website.
Maybe I'll take a volunteer measure and suggest something. Would it be useful if we tried to bridge the two motions that the Liberal members have put forward and come up with a one-year report that would not be as comprehensive as what is now in the law? I would have to talk to my colleagues here. Could we then do a five-year report that would be as comprehensive as this, and more, including your state of the industry?