The problem here is that we now have an amendment that actually eliminates a specific reference to Canadian ports. I think that is unfortunate. I think it's an amendment that does attempt to do, on a very small scale, what the previous amendment attempted to do, but in so doing it eliminates an important reference.
Certainly for coastal regions like the Lower Mainland, where I come from and where Mr. Bell comes from as well, the elimination of the reference to Canadian ports I think is problematic.