Thank you for responding to that question. That does raise concerns. Right now, then, we would have a report in May 2007 for 2006. Under what the government is proposing, we would be waiting until May 2010 before we get an updated report.
I have great concerns with that, because we have seen an evolution, certainly in rail transport. One of the reasons we're doing an inquiry into rail safety is because of what's happened over the last couple of years with rail safety and rail safety numbers. The counter-argument would be that some of that stuff is available through websites, but that's different from being transparent and clear with the Canadian public.
So I think I would have to disagree with the bill as it's currently written. I think Mr. McGuinty's amendment is very helpful, actually, because we need to have that report done on a much more timely basis than to be sitting from now until May 2010 before there is an updated report that essentially would leave us with the information from 2006.