Mr. Chair, I'm not going to get into a debate with the department about this. I made a political comment; I didn't ask another question. I will come back to the fact that having some material available on a website that may or may not be understandable in the form that it's produced is different from having a report that, by its very nature, has to be understandable and has to be communicated to the Canadian public. What we're talking about essentially is having a report that the Canadian public would have in its hands, where the information is actually communicated to it once every three years. That means essentially we'd be waiting until May 2010 to get any information in an understandable and effectively communicated form from 2006 on. I think that would be a real danger.
I certainly disagree with what the government is putting forward. I think the amendment helps to address that issue of understanding what the evolution is in transportation, particularly with a country such as ours that depends so vitally on the transportation sector.