In terms of putting a population criterion on it, the amendment introduces an element that currently does not exist in the licensing process. It means that if the agency were called upon to exercise this parameter, this exemption process, on a population basis, it would impose an additional workload on the agency to actually determine where a specific licence fits. It's information that currently is not tagged as part of the licensing process. There are some 800 to 1,000 small carriers. For all of those, it would have to look at whether or not they now serve a particular community of a particular size if that measure were brought in. That would be a very substantial inefficiency for the agency, and a new role that would have cost implications.
In terms of your question on how the communities see it, in some sense it's neutral to the communities. What the communities see is the seasonal operator who goes in and offers a seasonal service for as long as the season creates a market opportunity. To them, it really is invisible in regard to the engagement between the carrier and the agency, in terms of the licensing requirements and the licensing process.