I'm of the same sense as Mr. McGuinty, Mr. Scott, and Mr. Carrier. The more we're having this discussion, the more I'm realizing that I don't think the amendment actually justly covers the impact on these communities. We're allowing communities to basically see a termination of their seasonal service without any recourse, and I think there's a broad concern over that on this side of the table. I don't think the amendment stipulating 10,000 really deals with that because it means many smaller communities can see a termination of seasonal service without the appropriate consultation.
Might I suggest, Mr. Chair, that we stand this clause and come back to it at next Tuesday's meeting. In the meantime, I think we could have some discussion about the best way to deal with the issue.