Okay, let me put it the other way then. Maybe I'm not getting this. Clauses 23 and 26 say that the only way you can operate, purchase, or acquire control, but more particularly just operate an international bridge or tunnel, is to have approval of GIC, and if the existing legislation that created some of these entities did not have approval of GIC, and if this is not retroactive, is the purpose of this bill to, in effect, bring all those 24--or whatever it is--tunnels, theoretically giving approval of GIC so that in future...?
On May 11th, 2006. See this statement in context.