I agree with the change that was there. I'd like to see, then—whether we throw it in as what I'll call with the renumbering item 4(a) or as 5(a), because item 6 is really a procedural thing in terms of having the parliamentary secretary come there, or show it as an item farther down—that the issue of competitiveness be addressed at a future time. We can indicate the sequencing, so that Mr. Julian's point about indicating what we're trying to do up front.... I agree. I would just like to see this highlighted so that we haven't overlooked it; that's all.
On May 11th, 2006. See this statement in context.