Just before you do, I wanted to finish.
Just to answer the question, and I know it's not subject to discussion, I will tell you the reason we use “may” in proposed subsection 53.1(2.1). There are four other acts, as we mentioned two sessions ago, under which the Minister of Finance has the ability to approve a merger or transaction. If you look at these acts or at the Competition Act, the list of factors enumerated in these acts is not exhaustive. The intention of that is not to box in the minister if a factor that nobody had thought of at the moment a transaction is put forward comes up, and the minister can't do anything because the factors are not listed in the list. The “may” is to provide flexibility in terms of what will be put in the guidelines. Obviously the factors will be looked at, but if something comes up that no one has ever thought of because of the nature of the transaction, that factor will be able to be examined. That's the purpose of the “may”.