It's just that because this wording comes up several times in the provision, we're going to have to go with the drafters and look at how it applies. In essence, we don't disagree with that, but can we leave this for the end and come back to it if we have time, or maybe work with the drafters? We'll see if that works, but we understand what you're getting at.
On December 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.